The school functions as a sort of leftist seminary, where the seminarians are not eager to hear from competing faiths.

Column Archive • Books • Mentions • Links • Reviews • Bio
 
December 21, 2007     by John Leo    bio | archives | contact

The Alice-in-Wonderland view of Duke University received yet another boost: a committee of the board of trustees has affirmed President Richard Brodhead's "compelling vision" for Duke and found "general support, overwhelming support, for the leadership that the president is providing."The obvious question here is "What leadership?" Brodhead's performance during the Duke non-rape crisis was surely a disgrace large enough to get him fired immediately on any moderately alert campus.

Let's review Brodhead's dismal handling of the case. He fired the lacrosse coach without any hearing or finding that the coach had done anything wrong. He took no action and made no relevant statement when some of the hard-left professors harassed lacrosse players in class, and when one professor punitively reduced the marks of one player. (Imagine how he would have sprung into action if a gay person or a woman had been treated this way.) He refused to look at the overwhelming evidence, offered to him by defense counsel, that the boys were innocent. He made no comment when the racist black professor Houston Baker bitterly and falsely denounced the three white players. He said nothing and did nothing when death threats were made against the three. Instead of offering protection, he and his administration appointed a committee to examine "persistent problems involving the men's lacrosse team, including racist language and a pattern of alcohol abuse and disorderly behavior," a statement clearly implying that the players were racists while an out-of-control prosecutor was issuing the same untruths to voters and jurors.

Still Brodhead knows how the game is played and he surely judged his strategy by what happened to President Lawrence Summers at Harvard. Summers told many unwelcome truths and leftist professors forced him out. Brodhead told some welcome untruths and therefore kept his job. Brodhead 's performance was "a moral meltdown" of a cowardly man, in the words of Stuart Taylor Jr. and K C Johnson in their book, Until Proven Innocent. But given the moral climate of the modern university, cowardice was probably his safest course. But given the moral climate of the modern university, cowardice was probably his safest course.The Alice-in-Wonderland view of Duke University received yet another boost: a committee of the board of trustees has affirmed President Richard Brodhead's "compelling vision" for Duke and found "general support, overwhelming support, for the leadership that the president is providing."But given the moral climate of the modern university, cowardice was probably his safest course.

But given the moral climate of the modern university, cowardice was probably his safest course.

 

43 Responses to “Bad News: Brodhead Keeps His Job”

  1. patagonianplato Says:

    Dear Mr. Leo,

    Please review your article entitled, “Bad News: Brodhead keeps his Job.” You have repeated three paragraphs.

    On a personal note, I want to thank-you for the invaluable work you did for well over a decade at U.S. News. It is because of you that I continued to subscribe even after it became obvious to me that the magazine had become too politicized. Your common-sense, (as well as no-nonsense) editorials showed your absolute commitment to the truth, and dare I say, patriotism. In the last four years before your current sabbatical, only you kept me renewing my subscription.

    I hope you are enjoying your sabbatical for you have certainly earned it. I am in your debt for having kept me informed for so many years.

Leave a Reply


Site design by Harriet R. Goren Design
Site developed and maintained by Wordpress Themes | DocDigger.com